BIBLE DOCTRINES AFFECTED BY MODERN VERSIONS
By Paul L. Freeman
The following material is published by Way of Life
Literature. All rights are reserved by the author. Permission is
given for duplication for personal use, but not for resale. The
following is available in booklet format from Way of Life
Literature, Bible Baptist Church, 1219 N. Harns Road, Oak Harbor,
Washington 98277. Phone (206) 675-8311.
INTRODUCTION
The battle for the Word of God is going on today as it
always has. The work of the Evil One himself has ever been to cause
men to doubt the Word (Gen. 3:1),
to corrupt the Word (2 Cor. 2:17), and to misquote the Word (Luke
4:10,11). There are many Modern Versions on the scene today all
claiming to be more accurate or more readable renderings of the
Word of God. Most of these versions follow the MINORITY Greek Text
even though that text exhibits a corruption throughout. The King
James Version was translated from the MAJORITY Greek Text which
agrees with about 95% of all available manuscripts. The MAJORITY Greek
Text can be traced back to the Peshitta (Syriac Version) about 150 A.D.
Many Christian Colleges and Universities have switched
over to the MINORITY Greek Text (known as Westcott and Hort or
Nestle and Aland) for the classroom while still using the King
James Version in public preaching. Since there are over 5,000
differences between the MAJORITY and MINORITY texts a problem
immediately faces the student. The King James Version he brings to the classroom
is subjected to constant editing by the teacher who is using a Greek Text
different from the one the King James Version was translated from. The student
is well aware that God did not inspire two different Bibles. He must make a
choice and for the sake of harmony or teacher satisfaction he will usually
accept his King James Version minus the MINORITY Text corrections as the Word of
God. Should there be an area where agreement cannot be reached he is told
to decide on the proper rendering by exercising his spiritual
discernment. The schools that are following this double standard
will admit that when the King James Version is no longer needed for
Public Relations they will make the complete change to the New
American Standard or the New International Version. These two are
seen to follow the MINORITY Greek Text.
Those who want to replace our King James Version with new
Modern Versions are constantly stating that no Bible Doctrines are
affected by the changes. One school recently published an article
by one of its’ teachers in which he said that, “BOTH TEXTS ARE THE
WORD OF GOD.” It is difficult to understand how two texts differing
in over 5,000 places can both be the Word of God. It only serves to
show the absolute desperation on the part of the MINORITY Text
champions to defend their indefensible position. The purpose of this volume is
to show the changes made by the MINORITY text and how they affect the Bible
Doctrines which Christians have always believed. Though I do not consider any
change in the Word of God to be unimportant, I have singled out the most glaring
examples. A careful reading will show that the Fundamental Doctrines of
the Christian faith have been affected many times.
Are we to believe the scholars when they tell us that no
important doctrines are affected by the new Modern Versions? It is
obvious that they are not correct. What they really mean to say is
that when all the changes have been made the Bible Doctrines are
still there somewhere else in the Bible. If there
are ten verses showing the Virgin Birth of Christ, and they have removed
two, there are still eight remaining to prove the doctrine. That
may satisfy them, but the Fundamental believer sees that as a piece
by piece destruction of the Word of God.
We would accuse them of taking away from the Word of God.
They would accuse us of using a Bible which has many additions
inserted by overzealous Christian
copyists. The issue now becomes quite clear. We must either believe that
overzealous heretics have corrupted the original Word of God or believe
that overzealous believers have added to the original Word of God.
I can understand why heretics would want to corrupt the original
Word of God, but I cannot believe that Christians would add one
word to the Word of God which they have been entrusted to copy and
pass along. The Spirit of God within Christians would put a holy
awe and reverence around the sacred word and guided by that same
Spirit they would copy what God had given them. My conclusion is that the new
Modern Versions are based on Greek manuscripts that have been corrupted by
heretics who changed the Word of God to agree with their rejection of the Deity
of Christ and their Humanism regarding salvation. The Greek Text underlying the
King James Version is not filled with additions made by overzealous
Christians. It is the Word of God preserved by the Spirit of God
and it exalts the Lord Jesus Christ, giving him his proper place
and the glory due unto his name.
THE CHANGES IN THEIR PROPER NEW TESTAMENT ORDER ARE NOW
LISTED:
MATTHEW
1:25 “her firstborn” is omitted. That Jesus was her
firstborn indicates that Mary and Joseph had sexual relations after
the birth of Jesus and that others were born of her. The omission
here seeks to add credence to the false doctrine of the Roman
Catholic Church concerning the perpetual virginity of Mary. The
Bible is clear that Jesus had brothers and sisters.
5:22 “without a cause” is removed. In the Sermon on the
Mount the Lord warned of judgment for those who were angry with a
brother without a cause. Should this change be accepted everyone
who is angry with his brother may be judged. The effect is to bring
Jesus into judgment for failing to observe his own words (see Mark
3:5). Such is contrary to the doctrine of the sinlessness of
Christ.
6:4, 6, 18 “openly” is out. It is a Bible Doctrine that
Christian work done unnoticed for the glory of the Lord will one
day be rewarded openly (Col. 3:4).
6:13 “For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the
glory, for ever, Amen” is deleted. This ascription of praise to
“Our Father” is found in 491 out of 500 existing manuscripts. This
statement was made a century ago by Dean John Burgon.
8:29 “Jesus” is left out. The demons bore witness to the
fact that Jesus was the Son of God. It was an identification of
Jesus (in humanity) as the Son of God (in Deity). It affects the
doctrine of the Person of Christ.
9:8 “marvelled” is changed to “were afraid.” There is no
reason to believe that the people were afraid because Jesus healed the sick of
the palsy. There is every reason for them to marvel at the miracle.
9:13 “to repentance” is left out. The Bible doctrine of
repentance is one that men would like to do away with. God requires
that in order to be saved one must truly repent (Acts 17:30; 2
Peter 3:9). The word means “a change of mind” and there must be
that concerning God, sin and salvation. Men think that sin does
not really separate them from God—they must change their mind about
that. Men think that salvation is by works—they must change their
mind about that. There is nothing more evident today than the absence of
repentance among those who are professing to be converted.
15:8 “draweth nigh unto me with their mouth” is left out.
According to Isaiah 29:13 it belongs in because Isaiah prophesied
of these hypocrites exactly that way.
16:2,3 “When it is evening ... the signs of the times” is
all omitted. The Pharisees and Sadducees came looking for a sign
and the signs were all around them. Jesus called them hypocrites
because they could not tell the
signs of the times. 17:21 Whole verse is left out. Power with God is to
be had by prayer and fasting. That is a fundamental truth of the
Word of God.
18:2 “Jesus” is left out. This is done many times by the
corrupt
Greek Text of Westcott and Hort. I have not chosen to
remark about each instance
because it would add many pages to this work. The MAJORITY Text
continuously places the word “Jesus” in the narrative with the
definite article preceding it. Thus it places him in the center of
things and in command. It is doctrinally unsound for such
prominence to be discarded for the word “he.”
18:11 The whole verse is omitted. This verse tells us
that man is lost, that he needs to be saved, and that the Son of
man is the one who can do that. The
doctrine of salvation through Jesus Christ is affected by this change.
18:15 “against thee” is omitted. This omission sets us up
as watchdogs over others and if one sins we are to go and tell him.
Such is not the teaching of Scripture. Were we to declare every sin
we would be constantly busy (bodies) judging the actions and
motives of everyone. This change is a very bad error.
18:35 “their trespasses” is omitted. Same thought as
mentioned in 18:15.
19:9 “and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth
commit adultery” is removed. This is a very important doctrinal
change which concerns divorce and remarriage. A man who divorces
his wife and remarries commits adultery, and also the man who
marries the divorced wife commits adultery.
19:16,17 “Good” before Master is omitted. In addition to
that, the phrase “Why callest thou me good?” is changed to “Why
askest thou me concerning the good?” Good Master is correct and
Jesus responded to show the young man that only one was good and
that one was God. The conclusion should
have been obvious. Since Jesus was good he was necessarily God. The
omission and change destroys the intended testimony to the Deity of
Christ.
20:16 “for many be called, but few chosen” is left out.
The Lord would have us know that many are called to inherit eternal
life, but few are chosen by virtue of believing in Christ. It is a
Bible doctrine that God wants all men to be saved but few will come
to Christ for salvation.
21:12 “of God” is out. Jesus, who was God in the flesh,
came to his own temple and said, “My house shall be called the
house of prayer.” It was the temple of God and the God of the temple was there.
22:30 “of God” is removed. There are good angels and
fallen angels. The believers, in the resurrection, will be like
the good angels “of God” who alone are in heaven.
23:8 “Master” is changed to “teacher.” There are many
teachers but only one master. The change here takes away the pre- eminence that
God intends for his Son.
25:13 “wherein the Son of man cometh” is omitted. The
warning to watch is tied to the imminent return of the Lord. The
omission here does away with the doctrine of the Lord’s second
advent.
26:28 “new” is dropped before testament. The apostle Paul
tells us that Jesus said, “this cup is the NEW testament in my
blood.” The change here is intended to corrupt the Word of God and
to confuse Christians.
27:35 “that it might be fulfilled ... did they cast lots”
is all omitted. It is very important in Matthew’s gospel, where
Jesus is portrayed as the King of Israel, to show that he is the
fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. Here the parting of his
garments and casting lots is the fulfillment of Psalm 22:18 which
portrays the crucifixion of Christ. To omit this is to show
the intended corruption of the Word of God by the textual critics.
28:6 “the Lord” is omitted. The very reverent angels
said, “see the place where the Lord lay.” They would not say, “see
the place where he lay.” The constant attempt to humanize Jesus and
take away from his Deity does not endear the Westcott and Hort
Greek Text to believers.
MARK
1:1 “the Son of God” is left out. These words present
Jesus Christ as Deity. Such an omission is a direct attack on the
person of Christ and is
without doubt a doctrinal error.
1:31 “immediately” is dropped. The descriptive word tells
us when the fever left her and therefore provides us with a
miracle. The word left out denies the miracle and thus the one who
performed it.
2:17 “to repentance” is left out. See comments on Matt.
9:13.
3:15 “to heal sicknesses” is omitted. Jesus gave them
authority to heal diseases as well as to cast out demons. Sickness
is the result of sin (Adam’s) and the only one who has authority to
eliminate it is the one who would die for sin. On the basis of his
approaching death for sin on Calvary he could
say, “Son, thy sins be forgiven thee” and “Rise up and
walk.”
4:24 “and unto you that hear shall more be given” is left
out. It is a Bible teaching that those who seek truth from the Lord
shall be given more truth (see John 7:17).
5:36 “as soon” is dropped. The word in the Greek is
“immediately.” The word immediately is constantly dropped
by the Revisers of 1881. It is a key word in Mark which is the
Gospel of the Servant of the Lord who came “not to be ministered
unto, but to minister.” When Jairus was told that his daughter was
dead and that he should not trouble Jesus further, the Lord
“immediately” encouraged him to believe.
6:11 “Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable
for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment, than for that city”
is removed from the text. This passage emphasizes the great degree
of responsibility that was upon those cities who heard the Lord’s
apostles as they preached repentance and worked miracles before
them. Sodom and Gomorrah did not have such light, yet they are
still suffering the eternal wrath of God (see Jude 7 where
“suffering” is in the present tense). How much more the judgment of
America today where people sit in an abundance of complete revelation from God
and choose to remain in darkness.
7:8 “as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such
like things ye do” is omitted. The Lord not only condemns the
Pharisees for traditions of men, but he names them. There are
traditions of men today which are sending people to Hell and
preachers need to name them. It is doctrinally unsound to let
men go on in traditions and not expose them.
9:23 “if thou canst believe” is dropped. The father had
said to Jesus, “if thou canst do anything.” To this lack of faith
Jesus answered, “if thou canst believe.” It was at once a rebuke
and an encouragement to have faith in him. The father’s answer in
the next verse is beautiful but the Revisers ruined that also. They
omitted “with tears, Lord” from the most precious answer as
recorded by the Spirit of God.
9:45 “into the fire that never shall be quenched” is
dropped. The character and duration of Hell is described here and
the doctrine of eternal retribution is affected by this change.
9:47 “fire” is omitted. The words are inspired and in
complete agreement with Rev. 20:15. The consignment of the lost to
the lake of fire is a Bible doctrine.
10:21 “take up the cross” is left out. The word to the
young man was to divest himself of the riches in which he trusted,
consider himself dead to the world, and follow Christ into eternal
life. There are many who will let
go of riches and seek to emulate some of Christ’s teachings, but the way
of the cross they refuse. The cross for Christ and for believers is
Fundamental in Christian doctrine.
10:24 “for them that trust in riches” is left out. This
is a very glaring doctrinal error. It is not hard to enter into the
kingdom of God (salvation is a free gift through faith in Jesus
Christ) but it is hard for those who trust in riches to trust
Christ alone for salvation. Their God is their wealth and it is no
more compatible with Christ than Dagon was with the Ark of God (see
1 Sam. 5:1-5).
11:26 The whole verse is removed. It is a Bible doctrine
that if we regard iniquity in our heart the Lord will not hear us.
Answered prayer and clean vessels go together. When I confess my
sins and ask God for favor he requires that my confession of sin
include forgiveness of those who have sinned against
me. If I refuse to forgive others it becomes sin to me (see Eph. 4:32).
13:14 “spoken of by Daniel the prophet” is dropped.
Without the
reference to Daniel the appeal to understand is without
force. Though some might
connect it in their thoughts because they are familiar
with Scripture, it does not follow that he is referring to Daniel.
The reference to Daniel by the Lord
also authenticates his writing as inspired Scriptures.
14:22 “eat” is dropped. Our Lord did not give them a
relic from the Last Supper to take home and cherish. He gave them
broken bread to eat which (when observed) would always remind them
of his body which was broken for them.
15:28 The whole verse is left out. Jesus was crucified
between two thieves in fulfillment of Isaiah 53:12. It is doctrinal
error to eliminate clear statements concerning the fulfilling of
prophecy (see Luke 24:27).
16:9-20 Twelve verses are omitted. These verses are found
in every known manuscript but two (the oldest of those two leaves a
blank space where it belongs). They are found in all the Versions,
quoted by the church fathers, and seen in the lectionaries of the
church. There are many doctrines affected by the
omission of these twelve verses. The resurrection of Christ is deleted.
The great commission, baptism, eternal damnation and His ascension
into Heaven are all taken out of the Word of God. Certainly the
gospel does not end with “they were afraid.” Some say the ending
has been lost (see Dr. Ryrie’s Study Bible) but that destroys the
Bible Doctrine that God preserves His Word (see 1 Peter 1:23-25).
The evidence is clear that these verses are original and to cut
them out is to affect many doctrines of the Christian faith.
LUKE
1:28 “blessed art thou among women” is omitted. There
were many virgins in Israel at the time, but God chose Mary. The
Son that she bore would be her Saviour from sin. The Roman Catholic
doctrine of the immaculate conception of Mary (concerning her
birth) is nothing but pagan fiction. Mary was blessed AMONG women,
but not ABOVE women. The worship of Mary is contrary to Scripture.
This omission is designed to lift her above others and eventually
deify her.
2:14 “peace, good will toward men” is changed to “peace
among men of good will.” The first talks of the birth of Christ as
bringing God’s peace and good will (reconciliation) to men. Faith
in the death of Christ for our sins brings justification and peace
with God. The change offers God’s peace
to men who are good. That is doctrinally unsound since there is none
good.
2:33 “Joseph and his mother” is changed to “his father
and mother.” The Spirit of God is very careful to show that our
Lord Jesus Christ was born of a virgin and that he did not have a
human father who begat him. The change casts doubt upon the
doctrine of the virgin birth of Christ as
the “seed of the woman.” Later, when Mary refers to Joseph as
“thy father,” Jesus answers with, “wist ye not that I must be about
my Father’s business,” meaning that God was his father (see 2:48,49).
2:40 “in spirit” is left out. That the child grew and waxed
strong in spirit (meaning that he was spiritually strong) is
evident from verse 47. It is unlikely that the Spirit of God wanted
us to see how strong Jesus was with reference to his physique.
2:43 “and Joseph and his mother knew not of it” is changed
to “and his parents were unaware of it.” The first retains the
teachings of the virgin birth, the second discards it. The virgin
birth is a Fundamental
doctrine of the Christian faith and the MAJORITY Text upholds it. Let us
not hear of supposed overzealous copyists but rather let us beware
of overzealous heretics who would deny the fundamentals of the
faith.
4:4 “but by every Word of God” is dropped. Many are
willing to agree that bread alone cannot satisfy man, but few are
willing to live by every word of God. This quotation is from Deut.
8:3 where the omitted words are found.
The same one who said, “Yea, hath God said?” is the author of this
omission. The Revisers could not leave this passage in because they have changed
“every word of God” in over 5,000 places in the New Testament. Satan
does not mind if we read the Bible as long as we have a Swiss cheese Bible (full
of holes). Holes in the Word cause doubts in the Word, doubts cause faith to be
lost, and without faith it is impossible to please him.
4:8 “Get thee behind me, Satan” is omitted. The devil had
tempted Jesus to bypass the cross and receive the kingdom over the
world. Jesus, whose face was set as a flint to go to the cross,
refused to worship him.
6:10 “whole as the other” is left out. These words tell
us that not only was his hand restored to use but it was whole as
the other. The completeness of the miracle is attested to by these
words.
9:54 “even as Elias did” is omitted. Apart from this word
they had no precedent for doing such a thing.
9:55, 56 “and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye
are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but
to save them” is omitted. In reply to the disciples who thought
that they could call down fire from heaven, Jesus told them that he
came to save men. This passage is consistent with John 3:17, “For
God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that
the world through him might be saved.”
11:2-4 “Our ... which art in heaven” is deleted along
with “Thy will be done as in heaven, so in earth” and “but deliver
us from evil.” Only corrupt manuscripts can produce so many
departures from the disciples prayer which is found without
deletions in Matt. 6:9-13.
14:5 The word “ass” is changed to “son.” The use of
“son” is too much for the comparison the Lord is making. Only a
slavish loyalty to a corrupt Greek text can produce such a foolish change.
22:31 “And the Lord said” is dropped. The Lord Jesus was
God and as such he was omnipresent and omniscient. He was present
when Satan came before God and asked permission to try Peter’s
faith. He had prayed to the Father, as
Peter’s intercessor, that his faith would not fail. It was the Lord who
knew all of this and warned Peter specifically.
22:64 “they struck him on the face” is dropped. It is
error to minimize the sufferings of Christ. His facial appearance
was marred more than any man (see Isaiah 52:14 and 53:5).
23:23 “and of the chief priests” is omitted. The Lord was
careful to let us know that the religious priests were involved in
the rejection of Christ. Those who call themselves priests today do
likewise.
23:42 “And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when
thou comest into thy kingdom” is changed to “Then he said, Jesus
remember me when you come into your kingdom.” The confession that
Jesus is Lord is doctrinally correct because it is required for
salvation (see Rom. 10:9- 13).
23:45 “the sun was darkened” is changed to “the sun was
eclipsed.” The Greek word in the corrupt Greek Text is EKLIPONTOS from
which we derive the word ECLIPSE. An eclipse is caused by the natural occurrence
of the moon passing between the sun and the earth and usually lasts for about
3-5 minutes. The sun being darkened for three hours was a miracle of God
and will be repeated again prior to the Lord’s return to earth (see
Matt. 24:29) Many modern versions try to hide the Greek word they
are using to translate from the corrupt Greek text by using words
like: obscured (NASV), faded (AMPLIFIED), stopped shining (NIV),
failed (NEW WORLD), but some honestly translate the word “eclipse”
(20th CENTURY, MOFFAT, NEB, PHILLIPS). Humanism would try to
find some way to explain away the miracles of God’s Word lest they be forced to
accept it as the revelation from God concerning salvation.
24:36 “and saith unto them. Peace be unto you” is
omitted. Jesus had said to them, “Peace I leave with you, my peace
I give unto you” (John 14:27). He was now risen from the dead and in their midst
to guarantee that peace to them. One of the greatest benefits of
our salvation is to have peace with God (Rom. 5:1) and the peace of
God ruling in our hearts (Phil. 4:7).
24:40 The whole verse is omitted. The bodily resurrection
of Christ is proven here as he showed them his hands and his feet.
The omission affects Bible doctrine very much.
24:51 “and carried up into heaven” is left out. The
bodily ascension of Christ into heaven is a Bible doctrine that is
denied here. It leaves the Lord parted from them but does not tell
us where he went. The Revisers removed the doctrine and left the
Word in a poor state of disarray. Acts 1:1, 2 tells us that the
“former treatise” (Luke) ended with Jesus being “taken up.” That
ought to be sufficient to show the Revisers are wrong. 24:52 “And
... worshipped him” is omitted by the NASV. The MAJORITY Text says,
“And they having worshipped him returned to Jerusalem with great
joy.” The picture we have is of our Lord receiving
their worship because he is God (see 4:8 where worship is to be to God
only) and then before their
very eyes ascending into heaven. It is a Bible doctrine that
we are to worship Jesus and the omission by the NASV is a clear denial of
that doctrine.
JOHN
1:18 “the only begotten Son” is changed to “The only
begotten God.” Such a phrase
is foreign to Scripture. It accommodates the Arian
teaching that Christ was a lesser deity created by God. It agrees with the
teaching of Origen that Christ was not equal with God in essence and
nature. Sound Fundamental
doctrine concerning Christ is that he is one person of the
Triune God and that he proceeds from the Father by an eternal generation
and reveals God to men as
the Son of God.
1:27 “He it is ... who is preferred before me” is removed.
This change removes the
pre-eminence and pre-existence of Christ. John wanted us to
see that though Christ came after him, he in reality preceded and ranked
above him.
3:13 “which is in heaven” is omitted. This change affects
the doctrine of the
omnipresence of Christ. As man he was here on earth, as God he
was able to be everywhere present. The omission is a corruption
introduced by those who do
not believe in the perfect and absolute Deity of Christ.
3:15 “should not perish” is removed. This deletion removes
the opposite of everlasting
life, which is to perish. The doctrine of eternal
damnation is weakened by the change.
3:16 “his only begotten Son” is changed to “the only
begotten Son.” The word HIS
marks Jesus Christ out as God’s own peculiar son in
a relationship that no one
else has. It marks him as of the same essence and
nature. The Deity of Christ is involved and is thereby weakened (3:17 also
changed).
4:42 “the Christ” is left out. The purpose of John’s gospel
as given in 20:31 was to
lead people to believe that Jesus was the Christ, the Son
of God. That belief was to bring life to them. To omit it here is to deny
the purpose of the inspired
writer.
5:3b, 4 The statement regarding the moving of the water by
an angel and subsequent
miraculous healing is removed. Should this deletion be permitted
there would be no sense to verse 7 since that verse presupposes 5:3b, 4.
This is an effort to remove
the miraculous from the Bible and thus accommodate humanism.
5:16 “and sought to slay him” is omitted. The Scripture
teaches us that on many
occasions they tried to kill Jesus but by supernatural power were
kept from doing so (see John 18:6). He was omnipotent and there was no
way they could take him
until his hour was come.
6:47 “on me” is left out. The object of faith has been
removed here. Everlasting
life does not come to those who believe, but to those who
believe on Christ. This is doctrinal error of the gravest sort and has
been carried over into the
NASV and NIV.
7:8 The little word “yet” is dropped and the result is that
the
Lord appears to lie to his brothers, since he did go up to
the feast. There is a world
of difference between “I go not up YET” and “I go not
up.” The sinlessness of Christ is an indispensable doctrine of the
Christian faith and lying is sin.
7:53-8:11 The whole story of the woman taken in adultery is
omitted. This is one of the
most blessed portions of the Word of God. It is intended by God
through the inspired writer to amplify what came before in 3:17. The law
was given by Moses but grace
and truth came by Jesus Christ (1:17).
8:38 The words “my Father” and “your father” are intended
to show the difference between his father and their father, who was
Satan. By removing the word
“my” and “your” there is a deliberate
attempt to remove the offence and cater to the false dream of the
Fatherhood of God and the
Brotherhood of Man.
8:39 “If ye were Abraham’s children” is changed to “if ye
are Abraham’s children.” The
Lord intended them to see that they were not
Abraham’s children at all. The change gives us to see that they were
Abraham’s children and
therefore they ought to act like it. This is pure humanism and
contrary to sound doctrine.
9:4 “I must work the works of him that sent me” is changed
to “We must work the works
of him that sent us.” The uniqueness of Christ
as the Sent One of the Father is destroyed and he is placed equally with
the disciples as sent from
God to do the work of God. This is an attack on the
Person and Work of Christ and it exalts humanism. Jesus was sent by the
Father and the disciples
were sent by Jesus, “as my Father hath sent me, even so
send I you.”
9:35 “the Son of God” is changed to “the Son of man.” The
thing to be believed in John’s gospel is that Jesus is the Son of God
(20:31). The change by the
minority texts is not warranted.
10:38 “that ye may know, and believe” is changed to “that ye
may know, and understand.” The union of Christ and the Father within the
Godhead is that which we are to believe and rely upon for the certainty
of our salvation. To
understand the union is beyond human comprehension and if it could
be understood, that would still not be the equivalent of salvation.
11:41 “where the dead was laid” is removed. God intends
that we should know that
this was the very same place where Lazarus was laid. This is an
attempt to cloud the evident miracle which followed. (see also 12:2 where
“which had been dead” is also removed).
ACTS
Title “of the Holy Apostles” is deleted. To leave us with
“ACTS” means nothing. That the Apostles were sanctified
(holy) by the Lord Jesus and
sent forth as his sent ones is evident from John 17:17- 19. The
title in the MAJORITY Text is doctrinally correct.
2:30 “according to the flesh he would raise up Christ” is
omitted. It was not just
that one of David’s descendants would sit upon the throne, but
that his greater Son would be raised from the dead in a body of flesh.
2:31 “his soul” is omitted. The body of Christ was in the
tomb but his soul went down
into Hades (Hell), the place of departed spirits. The
teaching of the Bible is that our Lord had a body, soul and spirit.
2:47 “to the church” is left out. Believers are added to
the Church which is Christ’s
body. The Church is an organism, and when persecutors touched
the Church they touched Christ (see 9:5).
3:21 “all” is dropped in front of “his holy prophets.”
God has spoken of the Kingdom age by the mouth of ALL his
prophets since the world
began. In harmony with this Jesus spoke to the two on the road to Emmaus
about himself from “all the prophets” (see Luke 24:27). There are
others in the world who claim to be prophets but they do not speak of
Jesus and his kingdom,
therefore they are not of God.
3:26 “Jesus” is dropped. The specific name leaves no doubt
as to whom God raised up
from the dead to offer again the kingdom to Israel.
4:24 “thou art God” is changed to “thou art he who.”
There is no reason to accept MINORITY manuscripts when they
want to change “God” to “he
who” (see 1 Tim. 3:16).
6:3 The word “Holy” is dropped. When God led the Church to
choose deacons he made it
clear that they should be controlled by the Holy Spirit. Many
churches since have appointed men who had a lot of spirit and were full of
enthusiasm, but that is not the same as being full of the “Holy
Ghost.” Godly living is required of deacons and it is contrary to sound
doctrine to leave out “Holy.” The Greek word for spirit can refer to
man’s spirit or God’s spirit and lest we should err here God inserted the
word “Holy” before spirit.
6:8 “faith” is changed to “grace.” The Bible does not
teach that Christians are full of grace but rather that they receive
grace. The only one who was
“full of grace” was our Lord Jesus Christ (see John
1:14). The measure of faith is given to every believer to profit thereby.
7:30 “of the Lord” is
omitted. It was not just an angel that appeared to
Moses at the burning bush, it was an angel of Jehovah (the Lord). This
was an Old Testament
appearance of the eternal Son of God in angelic form. In plain
words it was the Lord who appeared to Moses (see Exodus 3:1-5).
7:37 “The Lord your” and “him shall ye hear” are omitted.
This is contrary to the original quotation as found in Deut. 18:15. In
Stephen’s sermon the “him
shall ye hear” is most important since those who
refuse Christ’s words will be judged by God. 8:18 “Holy” is dropped.
Four times here in four verses the Holy Ghost is mentioned. To drop the
word Holy in one out of the
four times is to create confusion and doubt concerning
the Word of God. 8:37 The whole verse is omitted. This leaves the
question of the Ethiopian
eunuch unanswered. Philip’s answer is correct in that belief must
be from the heart prior to baptism. The eunuch’s confession of faith is
in exact agreement with what
is required for salvation as given in John 20:31. Souls have
been led to Christ with this verse of Scripture and it is doctrinally
unsound to remove it. 9:5,6
“it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And he
trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And
the Lord said unto him” is
all omitted. This passage gives us a picture of Saul
resisting the Spirit of God as he was under conviction. Saul’s response
is to submit to the Lord’s
direction, having been humbled before the Lord. Without
Saul’s “what wilt thou have me to do?” there could be no “arise
and go.” 9:29 “Jesus” is left out. The reason the Jews went about
to slay Saul was not because he spake boldly in the name of the Lord, but
because he spoke of the Lord Jesus. As we well know in this day of
Modernism there is a great
difference. 10:6 “he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to
do” is left out. The would- be correctors of the MAJORITY Text would have
us believe that Cornelius was already saved and that it would be good for
him to have fellowship with
Peter. The truth is that Cornelius was not saved (see
11:14) and that there was something which he had to do. He must believe
on the Lord Jesus Christ or
he would be lost and go to Hell. 10:30 “fasting”
is left out. Fasting, to find the will of God, is a Biblical doctrine.
Though it is little used
today, especially since we have the completed Word of God, it was
evident in the New Testament apostolic times. 10:32 “who, when he cometh,
shall speak unto thee” is omitted. See above comments under 10:6. 15:24
“Ye must be circumcised and keep the law” is left out. This is exactly
the reason why the Jerusalem council was called or convened. There is no
doubt that the reply to the
Gentile converts made mention of the all important
question. 16:31 “Christ” is omitted. The word speaks of the Deity of
Christ. It pointed the Philippian jailer to the God he must believe in for
salvation. 18:5 “was pressed in the Spirit” is changed to “was
engrossed with the word.” When Paul was teaching he was always engrossed
with the Word. In Corinth Paul had been laying the groundwork at the
synagogue concerning what
the Scriptures had to say about their Messiah (Christ). When
Silas and Timothy came, Paul was under compulsion to show that Jesus was
the Christ. 19:10 “Jesus” is
left out. For the heathen to hear about the
Lord is not enough. They must hear that Jesus is that Lord. 20:28 “of
God” is changed to “of the Lord.” The word lord is sometimes used
of men and sometimes of God. Therefore, the change does not affirm the
Deity of Christ. Our
Authorized King James Version shows that God purchased the church
with his own blood. This establishes the Deity of Christ irrefutably.
21:25 “they observe no such
thing, save only that” is omitted. The Gentiles
had been told that they did not have to observe the law of Moses nor
circumcise their children
(see Acts 15:23-29). James was in error when he sought to keep
the Jews obedient to the Law after he had written to the Gentiles that
they were not under it. The
omission here leaves one with the impression that the Law was
optional for the Gentiles and possibly preferable. Tampering with God’s
Word always leaves the door
open for doctrinal error. 26:28 “almost thou
persuadest me to be a Christian” is changed to “do you think that in
such a short time you can persuade me to be a Christian?” King Agrippa was
“almost persuaded” and he was in possession of the truth concerning
salvation. The change would have us believe that he needed more
information and perhaps Paul
was too quick to expect a decision.
ROMANS
1:16 “of Christ” is omitted. The gospel message is of
Christ and centers around
his Person and Work. This is an inexcusable attempt to leave
Christ out of the good news of salvation.
3:22 “and upon all” is dropped. The doctrine of imputed
righteousness is most blessed to the believer. We are clothed in his
righteousness and God sees us in Him, therefore it is “upon us.”
8:1 “Who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit” is
dropped. To the truth that there is no condemnation to those who are in
Christ, the Word adds the
truth that they are characterized by a walk in the Spirit. It
is a Bible doctrine that those who are saved are characterized by a
changed life.
11:6 “But if it be of works, then is it no more grace:
otherwise work is no more
work” is dropped. The first part of the verse shows that grace
rules out works. The second part of the verse shows that works rules out
grace. It is intended for
those who want to intrude works into the established state of
grace for good measure (or safekeeping in salvation). This is a very
important doctrinal passage
in its’ entirety.
13:9 “thou shalt not bear false witness” is dropped. Those
who wrote the corrupt
manuscripts had no trouble with the other commandments shown
here. It is obvious that a smiting conscience would not permit them to
include this commandment
since it directly involved what they were engaged in, bearing
false witness about God’s Word.
14:9 “and rose” is left out. Many heretics are willing to
say that he died and that he
lives again, but that he rose (bodily out from among the
dead) they reject outright. The bodily resurrection of Christ is a
cardinal doctrine of the
Christian faith.
1 CORINTHIANS
2:4 “man’s wisdom” is changed to “wisdom.” Paul did not
reject wisdom in his teaching, he rejected MAN’S wisdom. 3:4 “are ye not
carnal?” is changed to “are ye not men?” It should be obvious
that they were men, but the Bible truth to be taught was that in their
divisions they were being
controlled by fleshly (carnal) desires and not spiritual
desires. 5:7 “for us” is omitted. This affects the vital doctrine of
the substitutionary atonement of Christ. If Christ did not die for our
sins then we are still under
the wrath of God and without hope. 5:12 The little word
“also” is dropped. That word indicated that Paul did judge those who
were within the church. Those who were outside the church were for God to
judge. The responsibility
for believers to carry out discipline within the church is
a Bible doctrine. 6:4 “set
them to judge who are least esteemed in the
church” is changed to “do you appoint them as judges who are of no
account in the church?” The Word of God teaches that it is better to
suffer wrong than to go to
court against another Christian before a lost world. It is
better to leave the judgment of the matter to the least Christian than to
the greatest worldly judge.
The change here completely turns around the way of God
and seems to rebuke the church for leaving the matter in the hands of the
least Christians. 6:20 “and
in your spirit which are God’s” is omitted. The
body gives us world consciousness and the spirit gives us God
consciousness. We are to
glorify God in our body by holy living and in our spirit by walking in
fellowship with God. Verses 16 and 17 talk about both. 10:9 “Christ”
is changed to “Lord.” In the Old Testament they tempted Christ and
that rock that followed them was Christ (see verse 4). The word
Lord can be used of the
Father and the Son. Changing to that word here eliminates the
pre-existence of Christ. 11:24 “take eat” is omitted along with
“is broken.” The symbolic bread was broken and given to the disciples
with instruction to eat it. It typified his flesh which “is being broken
for you” (literal Greek). Though not a bone of him was broken it is true
that his flesh was broken in many places before he died on our behalf.
11:29 “unworthily” is
dropped. The word gives the picture of a believer
treating the Lord’s Supper as a common meal, not reverencing the symbolic
meaning and spiritual impact it is intended to make upon his soul and
spirit. To remove this word
is a very great doctrinal error. When you consider that
sickness and death was the result of such unworthy participation, it is
no light matter. 11:29 “not
discerning the Lord’s body” is changed to “if
he does not judge the body rightly” (NASV). When we partake of the Lord’s
Supper we are to see through the elements to the Lord’s body. As you
think of the cost of your
redemption there ought to be more holy living. The change
brings absolute confusion concerning what body is meant, the Lord’s or the
believers. It is hallowed ground and the corrupters of God’s Word have
dared to tread upon it.
15:47 “the Lord” is left out. God is contrasting Adam
and Christ. To say that the second man is from heaven is not enough.
There have been men from
heaven who were angels. Here the man from heaven is the Lord. This
is an attempt to do away with the Deity of Christ. 15:49 “we shall also
bear the image of the heavenly” is changed to “we should bear the
image of the heavenly.” The first is a fact based upon the certainty of
our eternal salvation in
Christ. The second is an exhortation based upon the
uncertainty of a salvation by works. The first is sound doctrine, the
second is unsound doctrine.
16:22 “Jesus Christ” is omitted. In a phrase with
such import as to be accursed it is unthinkable that the test should
center around the general
term “Lord.” The curse of God is upon those who do
not love the Lord Jesus Christ. When his person and work is refused there
is nothing to look for but
wrath.
2 CORINTHIANS
4:4 “unto them” is omitted. The devil does not have power
to keep the light of the
gospel of Christ from shining, but he does have power to blind
men lest it shine “unto them.” 5:17 “all things” is left
out. The believer is brought into vital union with Christ so that it is
declared that he is in
Christ. In the sight of God “old things” of the sinful
nature are passed away. It only remains for those old things to be
unwound, like Lazarus’
graveclothes, in his daily life. In the sight of God “all
things” are become new though they make their appearance in the life of
the believer as he grows in
grace and knowledge. To deny that “all things”
are become new is to deny the finished work of Christ whereby we are made
accepted in the beloved. 12:11 “in glorying” is dropped. The
Corinthians had compelled Paul to talk about his experiences with the
Lord. He did not want to
brag about his spirituality. He felt that he had become foolish
in boasting or glorying. The change would have Paul saying, “I have made
a fool of myself.” That is
not what we are to understand.
GALATIANS
3:1 “that ye should not obey the truth” is omitted. The
Galatians had been bewitched
by the Jewish legalizers who had put them under the Law to
keep saved. Paul tells them that in so doing they were not obeying the
truth. The truth was that
they were saved by grace and that all spiritual blessings
were theirs in Christ. To turn from that is to be in error. 3:17 “in
Christ” is dropped. Paul is talking about the covenant with Abraham
through his seed which was
Christ. The law was added later and did not affect the
covenant of promise to those who would be saved by believing as Abraham
did. God promised Abraham
that through his seed (singular) all the families of the earth
would be blessed. That was a covenant confirmed before of God “in
Christ.” 4:7 “an heir of God through Christ” is changed to
“an heir through God.” The inheritance is to the children of God
through the mediatorship of Christ. We are not heirs of God through God,
but through Christ. The
change here is intended to destroy the reliance upon the
Lord Jesus Christ who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man
cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
EPHESIANS
1:1 “at Ephesus” is left out. It is hard to conceive that
the
Spirit of God addressed an epistle and then lost the
address. 3:9 “by Jesus
Christ” is removed. It is a Bible doctrine that all things were created by
Jesus Christ and without him was not anything made that was made. This
change detracts from the
Deity of Christ which is made evident by the fact that ALL
THINGS were created by Him. 5:30 “of his flesh, and of his bones” is
left out. The Bible teaching is that the believer is vitally conjoined to
Christ for a new life and
walk in the Spirit. We are “quickened together with
Christ,” “raised up together,” and “seated together in
heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” God likens this to the marriage
relationship where two people become one flesh. 6:10 “my brethren” is
dropped. These words make it very clear that Paul’s instructions
concerning Christian living
are for Christians who by the new birth have become Paul’s
“brethren.” There is a great danger that unsaved people might get the
impression that by imitating the things that Christians do they can become
Christians.
PHILIPPIANS
4:13 “Christ” is changed to “him.” It is precious to the
believer to know that Christ will give him strength for spiritual living.
Christ himself said,
“without me ye can do nothing” (John 15:5). The word
“him” is quite indefinite and can be misconstrued by Modernists to
include the “him” of any religious group believing in a Supreme Being.
COLOSSIANS
1:2 “and the Lord Jesus Christ” is omitted. Along with the
Father he is the source of
grace and peace. 1:14 “through his blood” is left
out. Redemption and forgiveness of sins is through the direct agency of
his shed blood. Many
Modernists today can work around the words “redemption”
and “forgiveness of sins,” but they cannot work around the shed blood.
Therefore they must deny it and be in direct opposition to it.
2:11 “of the
sins” is removed. What is left to work with brings the NIV to
translate “In him you were
also circumcised, in the putting off of your sinful
nature.” It is an established Bible doctrine that by the circumcision of
our heart which the Lord made, we are able to overcome the sins of our
flesh. But the putting off
of our sinful nature will not take place until we are
changed in the Rapture. Errors like this can only occur as the group of
translators persist in following the MINORITY Text. 2:18 “those things
which he has not seen” is made to read “those things which he has
seen.” Men were vainly attempting to worship angels as emanations from God
in a step-ladder effort to reach God. Paul exhorted them to hold fast to
the Head (our God-man Christ
Jesus) who proceeded forth and came from God (himself
being of the Trinity) that he might bring us to God. Paul says they DID
NOT see them, heretics say
THEY HAVE.
1 THESSALONIANS
1:1 “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” is
dropped. Are we to think
that grace and peace is bestowed by Paul? No, that is not within his
power. They have their source in the Father and the Son. 5:27 “holy”
is dropped from before “brethren.” Paul had other brethren according
to the flesh who were not saved (Rom. 9:1-3; 10:1). These were
sanctified and preserved
brethren and they were “holy” because they were accepted in
the beloved.
1 TIMOTHY
3:3 “not greedy of filthy lucre” is omitted. The phrase has
to do with obtaining earthly
gain through disgraceful means. This happens everyday
within professing Christendom. It is inspired of God and belongs in the
text.
3:16 “God was manifest” is changed to “He was manifest.” The
reference is to Christ manifest in the flesh, etc. The
MAJORITY Text tells us
that this Christ was God. There are 252 copies of Paul’s
Epistles which have “God”
and only 2 copies which have “he.” The MINORITY Text
leaves us in doubt as to who “he” is. The doctrine of the Deity of
Christ is greatly harmed here by the corrupt text. 4:12 “in spirit” is
left out. To be an example of the believer it is necessary to have a
spiritual man guided by the
indwelling Holy Spirit. 5:16 “if any man” is
omitted. It is unthinkable that the head of the house should be removed
here from the responsibility
to provide for widows. 6:5 “from such withdraw
thyself” is dropped. The Bible doctrine of separation is affected by this
corruption. We are to withdraw from teachers who are destitute of the
truth. 6:19 “eternal life”
is changed to “that which is truly
life.” The first talks about the length of life, the second talks about
the quality of life. You
cannot have the first without being saved. You can have the
second but still be lost, depending on what you think is “truly life.”
2 TIMOTHY
1:11 “of the Gentiles” is omitted. That Paul was appointed
to teach the gospel to the
Gentiles is indisputable (see Gal. 2:7-9).
HEBREWS
1:3 “When he had by himself purged our sins” is changed to
“when he had made purification of sins.” The omission of the word
“our” leaves us to wonder whose sins were purged, his own or others.
It is not plain and therefore the substitutionary atonement of Christ is
affected by the change. With the words “by himself” the Holy Spirit
wanted us to see that the atonement for our sins was accomplished by
Christ alone. The damage to
this verse is awesome in its’ consequences. 3:1
“Christ” is omitted. Our High Priest must be anointed of God to that
office and the word Christ means the Messiah or Anointed one of God. 10:34
“in heaven” is left out. Those who had lost all their earthly goods
certainly had no enduring substance here, but in heaven was their
treasure and reward.
JAMES
2:20 “faith without works is dead” has been changed to
“faith without works is
useless.” There is a great difference between dead faith
and useless (or idle) faith. The first indicates that no faith exists and
the person is lost. The
second implies that faith exists but it is not being used.
Again we see humanism and the false idea of a little divinity in each
one which only needs to be
fanned into a flame. The change promotes false doctrine. 4:4
“ye adulterers” is dropped from the text. No reason to excuse the men
from the scathing denunciation of God’s Word. 4:14 “It is even
a vapour” is changed to “Ye
are just a vapour.” In describing the
length of our life, God tells us it will pass quickly like a vapour. The
change would have US
OURSELVES to exist as a little steam. There is a leaning here
toward annihilationism. 5:16 “Confess your faults” becomes
“confess your sins.” In a context where God talks about sin in
relationship to sickness, he moves on to talk about faults (a side-slip or
deviation). The change “faults” to “sins” leads to the
priesthood and the confession box which is contrary to all of Scripture.
1 PETER
1:22 “through the Spirit” is removed. The Bible teaches
that it is through the
agency of the Holy Spirit that men are brought to believe in Christ.
In John 16:8,9 he convicts the world (all men) and draws them to faith in
Christ. 1:23 “for ever” is dropped and thereby the preservation of the
Word of God is called into question. The agency here of the new birth is
the Word of God, which is
eternal. Our new birth therefore is as eternal as the Word
which originated it. 2:2 The phrase “unto salvation” is added by
Westcott and Hort to “that ye may grow thereby.” This puts a question
mark over the certainty of our present salvation. It makes salvation a
process rather than an
accomplished fact. The doctrine of eternal security is denied by
the new exhortation to grow UNTO SALVATION. 3:18 “suffered for sins”
is changed to “died for sins.” The context has Christians suffering
for well doing and they are exhorted to keep on because Christ
also has suffered for us. It
is a Bible teaching that Christ not only died for our sins, but that
he suffered for our sins (see Isaiah 53:5-7). 3:18 “quickened by the
Spirit” is changed to “quickened in the spirit.” The correct
rendering attributes the resurrection of Christ to the Holy Spirit. This
completes the truth that all three persons of the Trinity were involved
in the resurrection of
Christ (see John 2:19; Rom. 8:11). 4:1 “for us” is
left out. Christ suffered for us, the just for the unjust, that he might
bring us to God. 5:2 “taking
the oversight thereof” is omitted. To watch
over the flock of God with authority is a clear teaching of the Word. 5:12
“wherein ye stand” is changed to “wherein stand.” By the
removal of the word “ye” there is a change from our standing in
grace to an exhortation to
stay there standing. The blessing of a perfected standing
in grace is thereby removed.
2 PETER
2:17 The words “for ever” are dropped. Peter, in the word
concerning false teachers, states that their darkness is to last forever.
The change leaves us with no
definite word as to their end. 2:18 “those that
were clean escaped” is changed to “those that are scarcely
escaping.” The change from past tense to present tense moves us from
a completed salvation to a
hope-so salvation. Those who are saved are in
possession of eternal life (see John 5:24). 2:20 “the Lord and
Saviour” becomes “our Lord and Saviour.” The false teachers had
escaped some of the world’s worst sins by following the teachings of “the
Lord” but they had never come to know him as “our Lord” is known
to real Christians. They were not saved and then lost, but never saved at
all.
3:2 “us the apostles” is changed to “your apostles.” The
Church is built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph.
2:20) and there are no
apostles and prophets today nor is there any such thing as an
apostolic succession. The phrase “your apostles” indicates that the
people he was writing to had special apostles designated for them and
lends support to the
continuance of a so-called “Apostolic Succession.”
1 JOHN
1:7 “Christ” is dropped. This word brings the cleansing
blood into relationship with
our great anointed High Priest who ever liveth to make
intercession for us. Many cults believe that Jesus (as man) died for the
original sin of Adam and that Christ (as a spirit) rose without the body.
John would have us know that
the one who died and the one who arose are the same. 3:5
“our” is removed from before “sins.” Once again the question
of whose sins were taken away is raised. There have been sins committed by
angels and men. The “our sins” refers the atonement to those of men.
(see my comments under Hebrews 1;3). 3:14 “his brother” is removed.
The teaching of the Word is that a true Christian will love his brother
in Christ. If a man does not
love a true Christian, then it is evident that he is
still lost and abides in death. The test of spiritual life is not that we
love, but that we love the
brethren (see John 13:34,35). 4:19 “We love him”
is changed to “We love.” The object of God’s love is us, and the
object of our love is him. Christians are not just people who love, but
people who love God because
of his grace. The very next verse deals with the professor
who says he loves God but is a liar. Lost people may love, but saved
people love God. 5:7 The
whole verse bearing testimony to the Triune God is discarded. There
are at least 20 Greek manuscripts which have this verse in. It is also
seen in the writings of the
church fathers and lectionaries. It directly affects the
Bible doctrine of the Trinity.
REVELATION
5:10 “kings and priests” is changed to “a kingdom of
priests.” The 24 elders are representative of all the redeemed who in
Christ are constituted kings and priests. A kingdom of priests smells of
Nicolaitanism (the rule of the clergy over the laity) and the priesthood
for a select few as in the
Roman Catholic Church. (The same change is seen in 1:6)
8:13 “an angel” is changed to “an eagle.” This is most
amusing and shows how captive the Revisers are to their corrupt text. In
a setting replete with
angels we are told about a talking eagle who pronounces
three more “Woes” to the inhabiters of the earth.
14:5 “before the throne of God” is dropped. This phrase
speaks of the perfect
standing that the saved have in Christ. They are without fault
before God because they are, like the church, “accepted in the
beloved” (Eph. 1:6).
20:9 “from God” is dropped. At the end of the Kingdom Age
the enemies of God are
destroyed by fire “from God out of heaven.” God is
the one who will destroy all enemies and create a new heaven and a new
earth.
20:12 “before God” is changed to “before the throne.” The
dead will be raised, not to stand before an impersonal throne, but to
stand before “the God”
[literal]. Many would like to change the personal God
into some kind of Divine Mind or Supreme Being.
CONCLUSION
All that has gone before makes it very clear that Christian
Doctrine is greatly affected
by the changes. The MINORITY Text is the source of these
changes and the New Modern Versions usually follow that Text. It is
unthinkable that men of God
would continue to advocate the use of these versions when they
are in complete possession of all the facts. The ministry of the Holy
Spirit is to guide us into
“all truth.” May he be allowed to have his way in our
hearts. If you have read this book and are of the same persuasion as the
author, I would exhort you
to give copies to your Christian friends. It is very
important that they understand the issue confronting the Church today. As
great numbers of Christian
people let their voices be heard for the retention of God’s
Word, as given to us in the Traditional Text, there will be a restoration
of the same in the pulpits
and in the Christian schools of our land.